Molfar Intelligence
Published case work on transhipment networks, investor screening and sanctioned-asset tracing, with source-referenced findings.
Read our reviewTen documented cases, from Venezuela and Russia to the North Sea, the Sahel and the Strait of Hormuz, each with what happened, what it cost and what an assessment would have flagged.
Common political risk examples are expropriation (Venezuela, Argentina, Niger), sanctions (BP's Russia exit, OFSI penalties), windfall taxes (the UK Energy Profits Levy), contract renegotiation (Mali), political violence (Red Sea shipping) and trade policy shifts (US tariffs).
| Case | Type | Macro or micro | When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Venezuela expropriates ConocoPhillips' oil projects | Expropriation | Macro | 2007; award 2019 |
| Argentina nationalises YPF | Expropriation | Macro | 2012; reversed 2026 |
| BP exits Rosneft after the invasion of Ukraine | Sanctions and conflict | Macro | 2022 |
| The UK's Energy Profits Levy | Tax change | Micro (sector) | 2022–2030 |
| Niger nationalises the Somair uranium venture | Expropriation after a coup | Micro (company) | 2025 |
| Mali and Barrick's Loulo-Gounkoto mine | Contract renegotiation | Micro (company) | 2023–2025 |
| Red Sea shipping attacks | Political violence | Macro (route) | 2023–2024 |
| The Gulf war and the Strait of Hormuz | Conflict | Macro | 2026 |
| US tariffs reset twice in 2026 | Trade policy | Macro | 2026 |
| A UK company fined for dealing with a sanctioned airline | Sanctions | Micro (company) | 2026 |
Macro examples affect every foreign business in a country or on a route, such as war or capital controls. Micro examples target one sector, project or company, such as a mining code or a licence review.
The same event can be both. A coup is a macro event; the nationalisation of one company's mine that follows it is micro. Telling them apart helps decide the response: macro risk is about whether and how much to invest, micro risk about structure, partners and contract terms. See what political risk is for the full set of types.
Venezuela took over three heavy-oil projects in 2007. An ICSID tribunal in 2019 ordered it to pay ConocoPhillips about $8.7bn plus interest; collecting the award has taken years. (IISD)
What an assessment would have flagged: Resource nationalism, a government rewriting fiscal terms, and treaty protection as the only real remedy.
Argentina expropriated a 51% stake in the oil company YPF in 2012. A US district court awarded minority shareholders about $16.1bn in September 2023, but the Second Circuit reversed the judgment on 27 March 2026. (Sullivan & Cromwell)
What an assessment would have flagged: Expropriation risk, and how uncertain and slow legal recovery can be even after a win at first instance.
BP announced its exit from its Rosneft stake and booked pre-tax charges of $24bn and $1.5bn relating to Russia in the first quarter of 2022, contributing to a headline loss of $20.4bn for the quarter. (CNBC)
What an assessment would have flagged: Concentration in a single state-linked partner in a country in confrontation with the West.
The UK introduced a 25% levy on oil and gas profits from 26 May 2022, raised it to 35% from 1 January 2023 and to 38% from 1 November 2024, and extended it to 31 March 2030. (House of Commons Library)
What an assessment would have flagged: Windfall-tax risk when prices and public pressure rise, even in a stable democracy.
After the July 2023 coup, Niger removed Orano's operational control of its mines in 2024 and announced in June 2025 that it would nationalise Somair, in which Orano held 63%. Orano said it would seek compensation through arbitration. (Al Jazeera)
What an assessment would have flagged: A coup followed by a review of mining concessions and a shift in foreign alignment.
A 2023 mining code raised royalties and state stakes. The dispute escalated to detained staff and the seizure of operations, and was settled in November 2025 with Barrick paying about $430m and accepting the new code. (Claims Journal)
What an assessment would have flagged: A new mining code, government cash needs and pressure on one large operator.
Attacks on shipping cut Suez Canal trade volumes by 50% year on year in the first two months of 2024, while transits around the Cape of Good Hope rose 74%, adding ten days or more to journeys. (IMF)
What an assessment would have flagged: Dependence on a single route through a conflict zone.
After strikes on Iran began on 28 February 2026, war-risk premiums for Gulf voyages rose to around 5% of ship value; by 7 September traffic through Hormuz had fallen to about ten commodity ships a day and Brent was near $97. (Al Jazeera)
What an assessment would have flagged: Escalation risk around a chokepoint, and its effect on insurance and energy costs.
On 20 February 2026 the US Supreme Court ruled that IEEPA does not authorise tariffs; a temporary 10% global tariff followed, replaced from 24 July by Section 301 tariffs, with the UK at a flat 10%. (Holland & Knight)
What an assessment would have flagged: Policy volatility in a major export market, and legal challenges as a source of further change.
OFSI published a £1.0m penalty against Sabre Global Technologies in May 2026 for continuing to provide services to a designated Russian airline, including routing payments around restrictions. (Cooley)
What an assessment would have flagged: Counterparty sanctions exposure, and ignoring warnings from banks.
Most had visible warning signs: new laws or codes, a change of government, rising confrontation between states, or a counterparty with political or sanctioned connections.
“Political hazard” is often used for the events themselves: coups, riots, terrorism, war, seizure of assets and sudden capital controls.
Insurers use similar lists. Political risk insurance typically covers expropriation, currency inconvertibility, political violence and contract frustration; see political risk consulting vs insurance for what is and is not covered.
Sanctions enforcement, conflict around shipping routes, US trade policy and investment screening.
In 2026 the cases most likely to reach a London boardroom are counterparties with sanctioned links, Gulf and Red Sea disruption (in September 2026 the Houthis took control of Yemen's entire Red Sea coastline, according to Al Jazeera), tariffs and the National Security and Investment Act regime. Our 2026 outlook summary covers the wider picture.
Assess before committing, structure for protection, choose partners carefully, monitor triggers and plan an exit.
The best political risk consulting firms in London do this work for boards and deal teams; our ranking shows how they compare.
These London firms do this kind of work. Scores, strengths and watch-outs for each are in our 2026 ranking.
Published case work on transhipment networks, investor screening and sanctioned-asset tracing, with source-referenced findings.
Read our reviewPolitical, security and crisis support for companies exposed to conflict and regime change across many countries.
Read our reviewPolitical intelligence for tenders, licensing, market entry and negotiations with governments.
Read our reviewWe score ten London firms on nine weighted criteria, from evidence traceability and sanctions-exposure mapping to Chambers recognition, and show every sub-score.
Expropriation of assets, sanctions on a partner, a windfall tax, a coup that freezes contracts, a new mining code, tariffs in an export market and attacks on shipping routes.
War or capital controls that affect every foreign business in a country, such as the impact of the 2022 invasion of Ukraine on Western companies in Russia.
A measure aimed at one sector or company, such as the UK's Energy Profits Levy on oil and gas or Niger's nationalisation of the Somair uranium venture.
It can run to billions. BP booked pre-tax charges of $25.5bn in the first quarter of 2022 when it exited Russia.
Yes. It is a government decision that changes the economics of an investment after it was made.
Sometimes, through investment treaty arbitration or courts, but it can take years. ConocoPhillips won an $8.7bn award against Venezuela in 2019; a $16.1bn judgment over YPF was reversed in 2026.
Yes. Sanctions are decisions by states that can make a partner, customer or route unusable overnight, and breaches carry penalties.
Not precisely, but warning signs such as new laws, regime change, rising state confrontation and connected counterparties can be tracked. See how to assess political risk.
All sources checked 1 October 2026. Company statements are first-party and not independently audited. See our editorial policy and disclosures.
{AUTHOR_NAME}, {AUTHOR_TITLE} at {PUBLISHER_NAME}. {AUTHOR_BIO_ONE_SENTENCE}