Molfar Intelligence
Turns outlook themes into a source-referenced picture of one market, counterparty or deal.
Read our reviewA summary of the main 2026 political risk outlooks, where they agree, what has happened since January, and what it means for UK companies. Updated as the year develops.
The main political risks of 2026 are geoeconomic confrontation and trade conflict, a more unpredictable US, pressure on European security from Russia, war in the Gulf and Red Sea, and rising social unrest.
| Report | Headline finding |
|---|---|
| Top Risks 2026 Eurasia Group, 5 Jan 2026 | Leads with a US “political revolution”, followed by China's bet on electric technologies, US assertiveness in the Western Hemisphere, “Europe under siege” and Russia's hybrid “second front” against NATO. |
| Global Risks Report 2026 World Economic Forum, 14 Jan 2026 | Geoeconomic confrontation is the risk most likely to trigger a material global crisis in 2026 (18% of respondents), ahead of state-based armed conflict (14%); half of respondents expect turbulent or stormy conditions over two years. |
| Allianz Risk Barometer 2026 Allianz Commercial, 14 Jan 2026 | Political risks and violence rose two places to 7th, their highest ever ranking; cyber stays first and AI jumps to second. |
| Munich Security Report 2026: “Under Destruction” Munich Security Conference, 9 Feb 2026 | Describes “wrecking-ball politics” straining the post-1945 international order as Western politics turns more transactional. |
| Political Risk Report 2026 Marsh, 26 Feb 2026 | Warns of decision paralysis: leaders expect major geopolitical change but spend too little time preparing for its strategic impact; flags supply chains, infrastructure conflict and political influence on business. |
| RiskMap 2026 Control Risks, 2026 | Frames the year around a “new rules, no rules” world, activated societies, organised crime, the AI compute contest and the trap of treating volatility as normal. |
| Political Risk Outlook Verisk Maplecroft, 4 Dec 2025 | Seven of the world's largest economies, including the UK, are among the countries facing the most disruption from unrest; attacks on commercial property rose in 53 countries. |
Summaries are our own, based on each publisher's public materials. Follow the links for the full reports.
On four themes: confrontation between major economies, a less predictable United States, European insecurity, and the spread of political pressure into business decisions.
Several risks materialised faster than expected: war with Iran from 28 February, disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, two US tariff resets, the Houthis' seizure of Yemen's Red Sea coast and a change of UK prime minister.
Higher costs and more compliance: dearer shipping, insurance and energy; tougher sanctions enforcement; closer screening of investment; and tariffs in the US market.
Risk maps from insurers and brokers rate countries for political risk, terrorism and political violence; they are best used to compare markets and set monitoring priorities.
Aon's 2026 Risk Map is an interactive portal covering political risk, terrorism and political violence, available on registration (Aon). Control Risks also publishes RiskMap maps alongside its forecast. For how maps and indices score countries, see our comparison of political risk indices.
As a checklist of themes to test against your own exposures, not as a forecast for your decision.
Outlooks are written for many readers. The top political risk consultancies in London turn the same themes into an assessment of one market, counterparty or deal.
Speed. Most framed Gulf and Red Sea risk as escalation scenarios; by September both had become operating conditions for shipping and insurance.
That is a general lesson about outlooks: they are good at naming themes and weaker on timing. Monitoring with specific triggers is what turns a theme into a timely decision. See political risk examples for cases where the warning signs were visible early, and what political risk is for the underlying concepts.
We review it as major reports are published and when significant events change the picture; the date at the top shows the last update.
Next scheduled review: when the main 2027 outlooks are published in January 2027.
These London firms do this kind of work. Scores, strengths and watch-outs for each are in our 2026 ranking.
Turns outlook themes into a source-referenced picture of one market, counterparty or deal.
Read our reviewPublishes the annual RiskMap forecast and advises on multi-country exposure.
Read our reviewPublishes Top Risks each January and advises investors on macro-political scenarios.
Read our reviewWe score ten London firms on nine weighted criteria, from evidence traceability and sanctions-exposure mapping to Chambers recognition, and show every sub-score.
Most outlooks put geoeconomic confrontation, US policy unpredictability, Russia and European security, conflict in the Middle East and social unrest at the top.
Published on 26 February 2026, it warns that leaders risk decision paralysis by focusing on short-term volatility instead of preparing for strategic geopolitical change.
A US “political revolution”, followed by China's bet on electric technologies and US assertiveness in the Western Hemisphere.
Geoeconomic confrontation, chosen by 18% of respondents as the risk most likely to trigger a material global crisis in 2026.
Seventh, their highest ever position, behind cyber, AI, business interruption and others.
Yes. Aon publishes an interactive 2026 Risk Map covering political risk, terrorism and political violence, and Control Risks publishes RiskMap maps.
Higher shipping, insurance and energy costs, tougher sanctions enforcement, more investment screening and a 10% US tariff on UK goods.
As a checklist of themes to test against its own exposures, with indicators and owners, and decision-specific assessments where exposures are material.
Political risk consultancies. See our 2026 ranking of London firms.
All sources checked 1 October 2026. Company statements are first-party and not independently audited. See our editorial policy and disclosures.
{AUTHOR_NAME}, {AUTHOR_TITLE} at {PUBLISHER_NAME}. {AUTHOR_BIO_ONE_SENTENCE}