Molfar Intelligence
Source-referenced country, stakeholder and sanctions-exposure analysis behind a specific market, partner or investment decision.
Read our reviewA plain-English definition, the main types with business examples, the difference between political and geopolitical risk, and what it looks like for UK companies in 2026.
Political risk is the chance that political decisions, events or conditions, in one country or between countries, reduce the value of an investment or disrupt how a business operates.
In simple words: political risk is what can go wrong for a business because of who holds power and how they use it. A government can change a tax, cancel a licence, seize an asset or impose sanctions. A coup, an election or a war can change the rules overnight.
It applies to rich and poor countries alike. The UK's Energy Profits Levy on oil and gas profits, introduced at 25% in May 2022 and raised to 38% from November 2024 (House of Commons Library), and a mine seizure in West Africa are both political risks for the companies involved.
For a company working across borders, political risk means exposure to decisions it cannot control: host-government policy, instability, conflict and the actions of other states.
A company trading or investing abroad carries political risk in several places at once:
That last point is often missed. When the UK added nearly 500 Russia designations in the first half of 2026 (GOV.UK), the political risk for many London companies was not in Russia at all but in their own supplier and customer lists.
The main types are expropriation, regulatory and tax change, sanctions, political violence, contract frustration, currency and transfer restrictions, corruption and state capture, and reputational exposure.
| Type | What it looks like | Typical business impact |
|---|---|---|
| Expropriation and nationalisation | The state takes an asset or forces a sale | Loss of the asset, compensation disputes |
| Regulatory and tax change | New licensing rules, local-content quotas, windfall taxes | Lower returns, higher compliance cost |
| Sanctions and export controls | A partner, buyer or route becomes restricted | Frozen payments, terminated contracts, penalties |
| Political violence and conflict | War, terrorism, riots, attacks on shipping | Damage, evacuation, supply disruption |
| Contract frustration | A state buyer stops paying or reopens terms | Unpaid receivables, renegotiation |
| Currency and transfer restrictions | Capital controls stop conversion or transfer of profits | Cash trapped in the country |
| Corruption and state capture | Contracts and permits steered to connected companies | Lost tenders, legal exposure under the Bribery Act 2010 |
| Reputational exposure | A partner's political links become public | Customer, investor or regulator pressure |
See real cases for each type in our guide to political risk examples.
Macro political risk affects every foreign business in a country, such as a coup or capital controls. Micro political risk affects one sector, project or company, such as a licence review in mining.
The distinction matters because the response differs. Macro risk is a question of whether to be in a country at all and how much to commit. Micro risk is a question of how a specific project is structured, who the partners are and which contract terms protect you.
Niger shows both. The military takeover in July 2023 was a macro event; the decision in June 2025 to nationalise the Somair uranium venture operated by France's Orano was a micro risk aimed at one company and one sector (Al Jazeera).
Political risk usually means risks inside a country, such as regulation, elections and expropriation. Geopolitical risk means risks between states, such as sanctions, trade wars and armed conflict.
The two overlap and most consultancies cover both. A practical way to separate them is to ask where the decision that hurts you is made. If it is made by the host government about its own territory, it is political risk. If it comes from rivalry between states, it is geopolitical risk.
In 2026 geopolitical risk has dominated the headlines. The World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report 2026 named geoeconomic confrontation as the risk most likely to trigger a material global crisis this year.
From four places: government policy, political instability, conflict and the decisions of other states.
Anyone with money, people or obligations in a market: investors, lenders, exporters, insurers, contractors and their staff.
Investors bear the risk of losing the asset. Lenders and exporters bear the risk of not being paid. Insurers bear the share they have agreed to cover. Employees bear the physical risk. Boards and directors bear the governance risk: they must show they understood the exposure before they committed.
With country indices for comparison and with decision-specific assessments that score each risk by likelihood and impact.
Indices such as the PRS Group's International Country Risk Guide, which rates political risk out of 100 points across 12 components (PRS methodology), compare countries. They do not tell you whether your partner, licence or route is at risk. For that you need an assessment of your own decision.
See how to assess political risk and our comparison of political risk indices.
Yes. Companies avoid, reduce, transfer or accept it, using assessment, structuring, contracts, insurance and monitoring.
Common tools include investing through a country with a bilateral investment treaty, choosing partners with care, staging investment, writing arbitration and stabilisation clauses into contracts, buying political risk insurance and setting early-warning triggers. Our guide to political risk management covers each strategy.
Mostly geopolitical and regulatory: tougher sanctions enforcement, investment screening, war in the Gulf and US tariffs.
Many UK buyers bring in a specialist when one of these touches a specific decision. We compare the main political risk consulting firms in London on a published method.
No. Country risk is broader: it includes economic, financial and transfer risks as well as political ones.
A country can be politically stable but carry high country risk because of debt or currency weakness, and the reverse. See political risk vs country risk for the full comparison, and our guide to political risk consulting for how firms help.
These London firms do this kind of work. Scores, strengths and watch-outs for each are in our 2026 ranking.
Source-referenced country, stakeholder and sanctions-exposure analysis behind a specific market, partner or investment decision.
Read our reviewGlobal political, security and crisis risk across many countries, with more than 100 geopolitical analysts.
Read our reviewMacro-political and geopolitical forecasting for boards and investors, including the annual Top Risks report.
Read our reviewWe score ten London firms on nine weighted criteria, from evidence traceability and sanctions-exposure mapping to Chambers recognition, and show every sub-score.
It is the chance that what governments, politicians or states do, or fail to do, costs a business money: through new rules, seizures, sanctions, instability or conflict.
A government seizing a mine, a windfall tax on energy profits, sanctions on a supplier's owner, a coup that freezes contracts, and attacks on shipping routes. See real cases.
Expropriation, regulatory and tax change, sanctions and export controls, political violence, contract frustration, currency and transfer restrictions, corruption and reputational exposure.
Political risk comes from decisions inside a country; geopolitical risk comes from relations between countries, such as sanctions, tariffs and war.
Risk that affects every foreign business in a country at once, such as a coup, capital controls or a war.
Risk aimed at one sector, project or company, such as a licence review in mining or a contract renegotiation with a state buyer.
No. Developed countries change taxes, sanctions and investment rules too; the UK's Energy Profits Levy and its National Security and Investment Act are examples.
By assessing it before committing, structuring the investment, choosing partners carefully, using contract protections and insurance, and monitoring early-warning indicators.
In-house risk and strategy teams, and specialist political risk consultancies. See our 2026 ranking of firms in London.
All sources checked 1 October 2026. Company statements are first-party and not independently audited. See our editorial policy and disclosures.
{AUTHOR_NAME}, {AUTHOR_TITLE} at {PUBLISHER_NAME}. {AUTHOR_BIO_ONE_SENTENCE}